Wednesday, September 24, 2014

Obama + UN = Embarassment

I caught just a little bit of Barack Obama's speech to the UN and I have to tell you, I was disgusted! First off, I've grown really tired of his teleprompter speaking style. It grates on you. He speaks the words he reads and you know damn well that he has absolutely no emotional investment in what he's saying. He's a thespian of the lowest order. Now, if he came out and actually spoke on his own from prepared notes, I might think otherwise. But no, that might make the mask slip and we would be able to see who Barack Obama really is.

But I digress.

Why in the world would he even bring up Ferguson, MO? Granted, the lamestream media made sure that story became an international event, but why play it up? Is that intended to put us on the same moral footing as the genocide going on at the hands of ISIS?

Secondly, and this really bugged me, why chastise Israel as not being committed enough to peace? In a nutshell, he puts Israel on a moral equivalence with the Gaza Strip and Hamas? Our only, albeit fading, ally in the Middle East. Obama proves he's an anti-Semite at every turn!

Barack Obama is an absolute disgrace. There were other elements of his speech that I didn't like, especially his bloviating BS about climate change, but the bottom line is this: any speech Barack Obama gives to the United Nations is designed to appease the dictators present and not represent the people of the United States. But then again, you already knew that, right?

Mark my words! Obama's next gig is going to be the United Nations. At that point, we need to kick that obscene organization out of the United States and quit funding them!

Saturday, September 13, 2014

Beheadings 101

Do you sense the drip, drip, drip of ISIS beheadings?

We know that they're plugged into social media, which means that they certainly saw Obama's pathetic speech this week. So, what do they do?

They release another beheading video.

These guys are toying with us (the United States). They want nothing more than to drag the U.S. and Great Britain into Iraq. Why?

I thing they've figured out that the U.S. and Great Britain are basically going to do nothing to stop this. Sure, we'll drop some bombs and trumpet our successes in the mainstream media, but, behind the scenes, ISIS will just pick another person to behead.

There is only one way to answer ISIS. BEHEAD them! Bomb them within an inch of their camcorders. Let them record the "dastardly" deeds that the bombing has delivered to them and then wait for an international outcry of "war crimes"! When that happens, bomb them some more, saying
"We win, they lose".

There's only ONE way for this to end. Either they continue to post beheading videos on YouTube or we destroy them ALL!

The sooner the our southern border so the bastards can't come over here! Duh!

Saturday, August 23, 2014

Typical Horse Crap from WAPO

As we could expect from the Washington Post, comes this (courtesy of Breitbart Sports):
The Redskins' hometown paper has long called on the team to come up with a new nickname from its editorial-page perch. But the newspaper that brought down Richard Nixon hasn't been as effective in bringing down "Redskins." Impotent to get ownership to change the name, the editorial page has decided to stop using the word that they have long called on the team to stop using. And in true grandstander fashion, the Post uses the forbidden word to headline their editorial boasting that they refuse to use the forbidden word any longer. That's not a promising start to the Washington Redskins becoming the Washington Redacteds.

The Post announces that "the matter seems clearer to us now than ever, and while we wait for the National Football League to catch up with thoughtful opinion and common decency, we have decided that, except when it is essential for clarity or effect, we will no longer use the slur ourselves." Presumably, the 79 percent of Americans who disagree with the Post don't represent "thoughtful opinion," to say nothing of "common decency." 
This is so much BS, I don't know where to start. Let's see, should there be a movement to demand that New Orleans change its name because the "Saints" might be offensive to atheists? What about the Miami "Dolphins"? Isn't that an exploitation of a mammal that can't defend itself from accusations about being a violent football player?

Then again, how long might it be before all the leftists in this country take exception to the name of the New England "Patriots?" After all, doesn't that promote the ideals of the racist, slave-holding Founders?

Perhaps we should conjure up an appropriate nickname for Team ISIS. What might you suggest? How about the ISIS Wapos?

Thursday, August 21, 2014

Wise Advice From Chris Rock

In light of the events in Ferguson, Missouri, I thought it appropriate to share some advice from Chris Rock:

Hat tip: Tony V

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Unfettered Access to Life's Continuum

Two iconic people, two memorable deaths.

Life is experienced in the here and now, yet we attach such significance to one life over another.


Are our own lives so insignificant that we must attach a vaunted status to those we do not know, except in movies? Must we trivialize our own lives to think that others are more-esteemed than ours?

Robin Williams died in despair, thinking that the only way out of his life (as it existed) was by his own, self-prescribed death. What a waste of God's gift of life!

Lauren Bacall died as luck would have it, not by a means prescribed by her, but by one that was written by another Hand.

As fellow travelers in this thing we call life, we will always experience both ends of the human continuum. What matters most is to understand that there is a beginning and an end. We can control the end, if we choose, but we can't control the beginning, at least not by our own hand.

Is the ending of life on either end less tragic than the other?